Literal Meaning
No one can change his plans to the injury of another.
Origin
This maxim is old and being used in modern times. This maxim has been interpreted by many jurists. This maxim has been interpreted in many judgments and cases.
Explanation
No one can change his plans to the injury of another.
Cases Refered
Adi Pherozshah Gandhi Vs. H.M. Seervai, Advocate General of Maharashtra, Bombay
The first was a case where the judge acquitted the practitioner. In such a case no appeal was open to the Attorney General under the Supreme Court Ordinance, and Lord Denning added “He has done his duty and is not aggrieved”. In other words, he did not come within the words of the 3 1 st section of the Order in Council. The Attorney General could not, therefore, ask for special leave as a person aggrieved’. But the case was different if the judge found the practitioner guilty and a Court of Appeal reversed the decision on a ground which went to the root of the jurisdiction of the judge or was otherwise a point in which the public interest was involved. In that case the Attorney General was a person aggrieved’.
Edited by Vigneshwar Ramasubramania
Approved & Published – Sakshi Raje
