Panchayats should be given greater powers, for we want the villagers to have a greater measure of swaraj (self-government) in their own villages
Political decentralization generally means strong and vibrant means of local government. Decision-making being closer to the people, decentralization ensures decision-makers more effective accountability to the governed. Panchayat Raj, a synonym of democratic decentralization, was introduced in India in the late 1950s and early 1960s to restore to the erstwhile institution of Panchayat the pristine glory that it enjoyed in ancient India. It was introduced by 73rd Amendment to the Constitution and formally recognized the third tier of government at the sub-State level, thereby creating the legal conditions for local self-rule – or Panchayati Raj. India has a chequered history starting from self-sufficient and self-governing village communities that survived the rise and fall of empires in the past to the modern institutions of governance with constitutional support. Though the basic structure of the PRIs or panchayat raj Institutions is identical across the states of India, it is described via different nomenclatures in different states. Every panchayat has its own characteristic features and their working also differs from one another.
Evolution of Panchayat System in India:
Pre British Period:
The institution of Panchayati Raj is not new to India. It existed since the earliest times. We get ample references about the Panchayats in Manusmriti, Arthasastra and the Mahabharata. During the Muslim rule also talks the system continued to operate unobstructed. Arthashastra of Kautilya gives a comprehensive account of the system of village administration prevailing in his time. The village was the basic unit of administration in the Vedic period. The Vedic polity consisted of two popular assemblies namely the ‘sabha’ and the ‘samiti.’ The Samiti enjoyed the powers of electing the King, while the Sabha indulged in Judicial functions. During the period of Mughals, Akbar It was autonomous in its own sphere and exercised powers of local taxation, administrative control, justice and punishment.
The state system, after the advent of the British, emerged as a highly centralized set up the form adopted during the British rule was an admixture of the British and continental patterns. From 1870 Viceroy Lord Mayo’s resolution gave the needed impetus to the development of local institutions. The real benchmarking of the government policy on decentralization can, however, be attributed to Lord Ripon who, in his famous resolution on local self-government on May 18, 1882, recognized the twin considerations of local government:
(i) Administrative efficiency and
(ii) Political education.
The Rippon Resolution, issued by Lord Rippon which focused on towns, provided for local bodies consisting of a large majority of elected non-official members and it was headed by a chairperson, who was also a non-official member. This resolution met with resistance from colonial administrators. The progress of local self-government was not that successful with only half-hearted steps taken in setting up municipal bodies. However, rural decentralization was not administratively reformed.
The Royal Commission on Decentralisation (1907) under the chairmanship of C.E.H. Hobhouse recognised the importance of panchayats at the village level. The commission recommended that to associate rural people also to be a part of administration it is necessary to constitute panchayats.
The Montague Chelmsford reforms brought a significant development of village Panchayats in a number of provinces. By 1925, eight provinces had passed panchayat acts and by 1926, six native states had also passed panchayat laws. D.P.Misra, the then Minister under Government of India Act 1935, remarked that the local self – Government bodies are inefficient. When the constitution was drafted, panchayat system was placed as the non-justifiable part of the constitution under Article 40 of the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Although the idea of decentralized planning is as old as the Gandhian economic thought, attempts at giving a concrete shape to this thinking may be said to have been made in the post-independence period. In the Initial Years, Local bodies like panchayats, by and large, functioned as civic agencies of the state government and not as instruments of micro-level planning. It was during the third five-year plan, rural development strategies were evolved and attempts were made to constitute three-tier Panchayat system was made. But it was not successful except for few states. Many Committees were set up to establish the successful Panchayat system but no concrete steps were taken in this regard.
⇒ Balwant Rai Mehta Committee:
The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee was a committee appointed by the Government of India in January 1957 to examine the working of the Community Development Programme (1952) and the National Extension Service (1953) and to suggest measures for their better working. The committee suggested the following:
- An early establishment of elected local bodies and devolution to them of necessary resources, power and authority.
- Panchayats should have special powers to levy a special tax on land revenues and home taxes, etc.,
- Its function should cover the development of agriculture in all the aspects, promotion of cottage and local industries, etc.,
- The body must be constituted for five years by means of indirect elections from the village panchayats.
- Governance in a way that was large enough for efficiency and economy of administration and small enough for sustaining a sense of involvement in Citizens.
⇒ Ashok Mehta Committee:
With the coming of the Janata Party into power at the Centre in 1977, a serious view was taken of the weaknesses in the functioning of Panchayati Raj. It was decided to appoint a high-level committee under the chairmanship of Ashok Mehta to examine and suggest measures to strengthen PRIs. The Committee had to evolve an effective decentralised system of development for PRIs. They made the following recommendations:
- Reservation of seats for the weaker sections
- Two seats for women
- Adequate financial resources for the panchayats
- The requirement of Constitutional sanctions
- To extend people’s participation in developmental activities.
The recommendations of these committees were not implemented due to the falloff Janata Government. During 1980’s, two important Committees were appointed to look into local governments: GVK Rao Committee in 1985 and Dr L.M. Singhvi Committee in 1986.
⇒ G.V.K.Rao Committee:
The committee suggested that the PRIs should be assigned the work of monitoring, planning and implementation of varied rural development programmes with a Block Development office.
⇒ L.M.Singh Committee:
L.M. Singhvi Committee recommended the following. that the Panchayati Raj Institutions should be constitutionally recognized and protected. A new chapter in the constitution should be provided to define their powers and functions and free and fairelection to be conducted through the election commission. It also recommended for the appointment of finance commission and all the rural development programmes are entrusted to the Panchayati Raj Institutions by amending schedule VII of the constitution.
Panchayat under Draft Constitution:
Quoting the Constitutional Assembly debate on 22 November 1948 that led to the insertion of the provision relating to Village panchayats in the Constitution:
K. Santhanam, the then Vice president of India mentioned the need for Panchayat System as follows: “A Definite and unequivocal direction should be given that the state shall take steps to organize panchayats and shall endow them with necessary powers and authority to enable them to function as units of self-government. The entire structure of self-government, of independence in his country, should be based on organized village community life”.
Shri T.Prakasam (Mad General), mentioning Dr Rajendra Prasad in this regard said that a very serious situation was created by not making the village republic or the village unit as the real basis of the Constitution. It must be acknowledged on all hands that this is a construction which is begun at the top and which is going down to the bottom.
Shri L. Krishnaswami Bharathi, though accepted to the amendment, was of the view that the amendment seeks to give only the political independence and not the economic independence. Also mentioned that the idea of Directive principles is to emphasise the way in which we want the country to function for which economic decentralization is necessary. This idea as quoted by Gandhi is that “Decentralisation both in the political and economic sphere is absolutely essential if India is to function as the democracy”. Though the amendment included village panchayat to be decentralized as the economic unit as well as the political unit, Krishnaswami wanted to make it more explicit.
Dr Ambedkar was of the view that in the hierarchical societywith highly skewed nature of assets and power distribution, vesting more powers at the village level would only perpetuate the exploitation of the disposed of,
Finally, Article 31A was included in the Draft Constitution. This Article was amended and renumbered as article 40(DPSP) in the revision stage of the Draft Constitution.
After 40 and above years in the view of the shortcomings which have been observed it is considered that there is an imperative need to enshrine in the constitution certain basic and essential features of the panchayat institutions and make the system of panchayat mandatory. Making the provision mandatory would make democracy much more efficient. Indira Gandhi has also accepted the need for the mandatory provision. Accordingly, it is proposed to add a new part relating to the panchayat. The bill was introduced on the 10th of September 1991 and passed as an Act in 1992 and came to be enforceable from 20th April 1993.
73rd Constitutional Amendment:
The passage of the Constitution (73rdAmendment) Act, 1992 (or simply the Panchayati Raj Act) marks a new era in the federal democratic set up of the country. The then Prime Minister P.V. Narasimha Rao of Congress government introduced a fresh bill on Panchayat Raj in September 1991. It provided the much – needed constitutional sanction to the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) for functioning as an organic and integral part of the nation’s democratic process. Panchayati Raj system does not apply to the Schedule V areas of the nine states, Schedule VI Areas of the North-East and the District of Darjeeling in West Bengal as well as J&K. Currently, the Panchayati Raj system functions in all states except Nagaland, Meghalaya, and Mizoram, and in all Union Territories except Delhi.
The provisions of the amendment include Articles 243, 243A to 243-O which were added as parts of newly inserted Part IX of the Constitution. It is the first formal democratic institution at the village level. The chairperson of this unit is called as Sarpanch.
The Amendment introduced across the board three-tier system of the PRIs at village Panchayat, Block and District levels.
⇒ For SC/ST:
Article 243D provides for reservation of seats at all levels for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and women. While the reservation for the SCs/STs is as per their actual proportion in a population of the concerned area. Let’s take, for example, the Scheduled Castes which constitute 30% of the total population and the Scheduled Tribes at 21%, then 30% and 21% seats shall be reserved for them respectively.
Since the Panchayat Raj Act do not automatically cover the scheduled areas, The Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA) was in acted on 24 December 1996 to enable Tribal Self Rule in these areas. The Act has also been extended the provisions of Panchayats to the tribal areas of nine states that have Fifth Schedule Areas. It should also be noted that most of the Northeastern states falling under Sixth Schedule Areas (where autonomous councils exist) are not covered by PESA, the reason being, they have their own Autonomous councils for governance. The nine states with Fifth Schedule areas are Orissa, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Chattisgarh. However, it is a clear indication that sincere implementation of PESA has not been seriously attempted by the state governments.
In Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar, It was held that Jharkhand Panchayat Raj Act 2001[sec 21(B),40(B),55(B)] providing 100% reservation in favour of scheduled tribes for chairman’s position in panchayats located in the scheduled area in Jharkhand is constitutionally permissible. The SC, thus allows parliament to provide the ‘modifications and exceptions’ expressly in the application of part IX to scheduled areas.
⇒ For Women:
Article 243 D of the Constitution of India mandates that at least one-third of the total number of seats filled by direct elections in the Panchayats shall be reserved for women. However, The Constitution (One Hundred and Tenth Amendment) Bill, 2009 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on November 26, 2009 by the then Minister of Panchayati Raj, Shri C.P. Joshi inorder to amend Article 243 D of the Constitution of India. The bill is aiming at increasing the proportion of women to be the part of panchayats from one third to one half. It is be noted that the states like Andhra Pradesh, Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Rajasthan and Tripura have already a reservation for 50% of their posts for women.
⇒ For Chairpersons:
A State may by law make provision for similar reservation of the offices of Chairpersons in the Panchayats at the village and other levels. These reservations favouring the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes shall cease to be operative at the period specified in Article 334. A State may by law also reserve seats or offices of Chairpersons in the Panchayat at any level in favour of backward classes of citizens.
Article 243 E is a provision on the duration of members in Panchayat. A clear term for 5 years has been provided for the Panchayats and elections must take place before the expiry of the terms. However, the Panchayat may be dissolved earlier on specific grounds in accordance with the state legislation. In that case, the elections must take place before the expiry of 6 months of the dissolution.
Article 243F makes provisions for disqualifications from the membership. As per this article, any person who is qualified to become an MLA is qualified to become a member of the Panchayat, but for Panchayat the minimum age prescribed is 21 years. Further, the disqualification criteria are to be decided by the state legislature by law.
⇒ State legislature on Panchayats:
- The state legislature can confer power upon panchayat systems (A.243G to 243H) and the 11th schedule enshrines the distribution of powers between the State legislature and the Panchayats.
- The State can authorize a Panchayat by Law to levy, collect and appropriate taxes, duties, etc
- To review the financial position and status of the Panchayat the state legislatures are authorized to appoint a Finance Commission.
- The main source of income of the panchayat samiti is grants-in-aid and loans from the respective State Governments.
⇒ Bar on Interference by Courts:
Referring to Article 329 of the Constitution, the courts cannot interfere in matters relating to allotment of seats, delimitation of Constituencies as under article 243K. Any matters relating to the election of panchayats can be questioned only by means of Election petition following certain procedures prescribed by the State legislature.
Each village has its own set of issues, which only the locals can understand. Members of a Panchayat are far more cognizant of the region-specific problems, and thus they are capable of taking a more informed decision in favour of the people of their village. Taking into consideration the specified needs of their inhabitants, the panchayats work accordingly. The panchayats undertake works of varied levels starting from creation of necessary establishments such as primary schools, to hygiene-related issues, to water requirements, to seek the central government’s help towards generating jobs at the village level as well. They also have a major share of contribution towards mobilization of local resources, encouraging, large-scale community participation, planning at the lower levels, reduction of corruption as well as improvement in quality oh nations working.
- Few states have not yet rested and delegated the powers to the panchayats to the true meaning and spirit of the 73rd constitutional amendment. Even if the functions have been delegated, the required powers to execute the said functions are not with the PRIs.
- There is a general lack of manpower in the PRIs, particularly at the village level. With a limited number of officials, even after the complete devolution of powers, it may become difficult for the PRIs to look after all the works assigned to them by the State government. Unless the PRIs are equipped with adequate staff to discharge their functions
- As required by the panchayat act, the gram sabhas have not been efficient in ensuring and empowering the participation of people at the lower levels to the fullest sense possible.
- Powers given to the State Election Commissions also vary from State to State. No uniformity is ensured in this regard. Also, Recommendations of State Finance Commissions (SFCs) are generally not taken seriously.
- While women got political representation, the real power was usurped by their husbands, “The Sarpanch Pati” depriving them of any meaningful gains. Caste and gender-based discrimination are still prevalent and despite earning a political position, women are denied their due respect. Widespread illiteracy and ignorance further inhibit their capacity to perform.
Panchayati Raj: A Comparative analysis among the Indian States:
Some states have taken measures towards meeting the basic requirements of devolution as specified in the Constitution, other states have taken off to the next level in terms of promoting good governance, efficient service delivery, decentralised democracy, transparency, accountability and connectivity. Some of the recent initiatives as visible from the efforts of the state governments are presented below for the benefit of other states
The Karnataka government has enacted the Karnataka Sakala Services Act 2011, which guarantees delivery of essential civic services to the citizens of Karnataka, within the stipulated time limit. 11 services pertaining to gram panchayats are covered under Sakala, which includes maintenance of drinking water, street lights and village sanitation, issue of records such as cattle and crop census, BPL list, e-payment for work executed under developmental schemes, etc.
Measures have been taken by the Rajasthan Government, to strengthen the District Planning Committees and the Standing Committees at all three rungs of the panchayats.
Government of Maharashtra had launched the project called SANGRAM – Sanganakiya Grameen Maharashtra, a computerised programme for enabling rural Maharashtra to fight against corruption. This project is for effective implementation of development programmes, which is the convergent implementation of administrative reforms, on-line services, computerization, biometrics attendance, etc.
PanchParameswar Yojana, was launched to consolidate the funds made available to panchayats in the Panchayati Raj account through Integrated Action Plan for Rural Development. As per this initiative, the Gram Panchayats would get consolidated funds on the basis of the population during the financial year.
The Gram Sabha SashaktikaranKaryakrama (GSSK) campaign was launched, which is a drive for social mobilization and enhancing the institutional capacity of panchayats through administrative and technical support.
Through a notification, a time limit has been stipulated for the delivery of nine public services to citizens by gram panchayat and janpad panchayats. Responsibilities have also been fixed on certain public authorities for – (a) The delivery of each public service. (b) In the event of default and (c) Appellate authority. Every applicant who cannot obtain public services within the stipulated time shall be entitled to get the compensation.
Panchayat systems in all the states aim at effective decentralization and self-rule. But the means they adopt to achieve the same vary from states to states as mentioned above.
There is a conventional classification of fiscal, political and administrative decentralization using which the three-volume study conducted by the World Bank on Indian Decentralisation ranks India the first in terms of Political decentralisation and last in terms of Administrative decentralization. Our Indian statutes and other Union territories are willing to accept the panchayat system and give them recognition to hold elections. They also respect their stipulations with regard to reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and women. However, they are not ready to give them sufficient administrative control without which efficient functioning is at stake.
Again, although most States have established SECs, whose primary responsibilities are to organise and oversee Panchayat elections, and to prepare the electoral rolls, many have been unwilling to relinquish powers of delimitation – i.e. the power to define electoral constituencies. There is a lack of proper demarcation and clarity of functions among the panchayats and the other levels of government, and the states also have the rights to either assign o if necessary, to withdraw functions given to the panchayats. This again shows the supremacy of state upon the so-called autonomous panchayat governance.
A detailed insight into article 40 and articles 43 to 243O shows that the makers of our constitution want the village panchayats to be responsible for its own affairs as well as to act as a solid foundation for political democracy of the country. For encouraging development in the rural parts of the country, it is necessary to mobilize the resources in the hands of people and thus accelerate the participation of them in the decision making the process that has an effect on their daily living. The pragmatic philosophy of miniaturized participative democracy, where every man matters, is the cornerstone of developmental dynamics. The higher level policy makers are also well aware that the empowerment goals at Panchayat level have not been fully achieved but with some procedural, legislative and most importantly attitudinal changes, it is not far from being achieved.
Edited by – Sakshi Agarwal
Quality Check – Ankita Jha
Approved & Published by – Sakshi Raje
Subrata K. Mitra, Making local government work: Local elites, Panchayati Raj and governance in India, in Atul Kohli (Ed.). The Success of India’s Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2017), http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/354/11/09_chapter2.pdf (last visited Mar 19, 2017).
 P. L. Mehta and Surender Singh Jaswal, Genesis of Panchayati Raj philosophy in India: some reflections, http://dspace.cusat.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/10861/1/Genesis%20of%20panchayati%20raj%20philosophy%20in%20India_%20some%20reflections.PDF, (last visited 17 March 2017).
Evolution of local self-government, cseindiaportal (2017),*Referred Website Deleted*
Panchayats in Pre-Independence Day: Panchayat Raj, Mkgandhi.org (2017),
http://www.mkgandhi.org/panchayat_raj/preindependence_panchayats.htm (last visited Mar 19, 2017).
Aslam, M., Panchayati Raj in India, National Book Trust, 2007.
Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, p.696.
Pandey, J.N., The Constitution of India, Central Law Agency, 50th Edition, 2013.
 C.A.D. VII, pp. 520-527.
Nath, Akshaya, National Panchayati Raj Day: Here are few things that you need to know about Panchayati Raj,SaddaHaq, Published on 24 April, 2015, (last visited 15 March, 2017).
 Supra note 8.
Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas Act) / PESA – Features, Careerride.com (2016),
http://www.careerride.com/view/panchayat-extension-to-scheduled-areas-act-pesa-features-22111.aspx.(last visited Mar 19, 2017).
 AIR 2010 SC 3244.
Social Empowerment: Role of Women: Insights,http://www.insightsonindia.com/2015/07/27/1-critically-discuss-the-role-of-panchayat-raj-institutions-in-the-empowerment-of-women/, Published on July 27, 2015, (last visited March 19, 2017).
Indiagovernance.gov.in (2017), http://indiagovernance.gov.in/thinkpiece/?thinkpiece=3
(last visited Mar 19, 2017).
Panchayati Raj in India – beginning, Types, Importance, Political Corner,
http://www.elections.in/political-corner/panchayat-raj-in-india/#sthash.ZLgwwDHH.dpuf, (last visited Mar 21, 2017).
 Geeta and Sanjay Misra, Panchayat Raj Institution in India: Prospects and Retrospections, published on March, 2016, e-ISSN: 2279-0837, http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2021%20Issue3/Version-3/J2103036370.pdf, (last visited March, 20 2017).
Critically discuss the role of Panchayat Raj institutions in the empowerment of women. – Insights, http://www.insightsonindia.com/2015/07/27/1-critically-discuss-the-role-of-panchayat-raj-institutions-in-the-empowerment-of-women/ (last visited Mar 21, 2017).