Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onus

Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onus

Literal Meaning

He who derives a benefit ought also to bear a burden.

Explanation

Literally this means that he who enjoys the benefit ought also to bear the burden; he who enjoys the advantage of a right should also take the accompanying disadvantage. In other words, a privilege is subject to its conditions.[1]

Illustration

‘A’ was allowed by to bring cell phone in the classroom as the class teacher was his relative, however, when he got caught by the principle while inspection, he had to pay a big sum of fine.

Indian Law Position

The principle laid down in the maxim ‘Qui Sentit Commodum, Debet Et Sentire Onus’ is a very well recognized maxim all over the world and hence, is widely applicable in India.

Case Laws

Smt. Phul Kumari Tripathi v. Smt. Bina Devi @ Saraswati Devi

In the above-mentioned case honourable Patna High Court referred to the maxim ‘Qui sentit commodum, debet et sentire onus.’[1]

Fazulbhoy Jaffer v. The Credit Bank of India Ltd

In the above-mentioned case, honourable Bombay High Court referred to the maxim ‘Qui Sentit Commodum, debet et sentire onus’.[2]

S Pine Builders Private Limited v. The Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Limited.

The maxim ‘Qui Sentit Commodum, debet et sentire onus’ was also referred to in the above mentioned case by the honourable Patna High Court. [3]

 

Edited by Vigneshwar Ramasubramania

Approved & Published – Sakshi Raje

Reference

[1] Squire Patton Boggs, Qui sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus, Lexology (July 4, 2019, 8:01PM), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=25f758a4-403d-44d7-a290-5e6d3e1e7bcc          

[2] Smt. Phul Kumari Tripathi v. Smt. Bina Devi, 2003 (3) BLJR 1782

[3] Fazulbhoy Jaffer v. The Credit Bank Of India Ltd, (1914) 16 BOMLR 730.

[4] S Pine Builders Private Limited v. The Bihar State Credit And Investment Corporation Limited, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11381 of 2011