SC asks Centre to treat plea as representation seeking Criminal Law Amendments

0
210
Plea in SC demanding strict laws for rape, POCSO, PMLA, NDPS, etc.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court asked the Ministers of Home Affairs, Law and Justice and Women and Child Development to treat a plea as a representation which seeks directions for reforms and amendments in criminal law to make it more stringent and deterrent in cases of Rape/Gang Rape, PMLA, POCSO and NDPS, etc.

Justice NV Ramana, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Aniruddha Bose while appreciating the efforts of the petitioner Kirti Ahuja who appeared and argued the matter in person through Video Conferencing disposed the plea.

The Apex Court said; “We appreciate the efforts made by the petitioner-in-person but do not think it proper to give any direction to the Government to legislate.”

Praying for the following reliefs, the Court was hearing the plea filed under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution;

A. Issue writ, order or direction to the respondents to bring certain reforms and amendments in the law to make it more stringent and deterrent in cases of rape with grievous injury, gang rape and rape/gang-rape with murder by :-

I. By making stringent provisions of bail for such accused as are in the case of offences under special Enactments like POCSO, PMLA and NDPS;

II. By giving rape victims the right to appoint lawyer of their choice having all powers like that of a defence lawyer by making amendment in Section 301 Cr.P.C.;

III. By bringing separate legislation like that of POCSO to deal with cases of rape with grievous injury, gang rape and rape/gang-rape with death;

IV. By making and implementing the provision of Fast Track Court for such cases not only at the Trial level but also at Appellate Stage and to implement the Amendment made in Section 173 and 309 Cr.P.C. in 2018 in its right perspective;

V. By changing the provision of right to appeal of accused in such heinous cases, by giving them only one opportunity of right to Appeal either in High Court or in Supreme Court;

VI. By bringing the provision of reverse onus on the accused in such rape cases as it is in cases of POCSO under Section 29 and 30 of the Act;

VII. By making stringent provisions for punishment to police officials for intentionally making lapses in investigation by not following the law in such cases;

B. Issue strict guidelines and directions for proper implementation of the existing rape-laws including the proposed suggestions detailed in Para 17 of this petition along with strict action to be taken against non-implementation of such laws;

C. Issue Writ, order or direction to the respondents for proper implementation of guidelines already issued by this Court in regard to the protection of identity of rape victims along with making people aware about the guidelines of this Court as well as Section 228A IPC by way of Advertisements and Disclaimers;

D. Issue Writ, Order or Direction to the respondents for introducing a compulsory subject on Gender Sensitization, moral and sex education in curriculum of the school

“We grant liberty to the petitioners-in-person to make a representation to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, and Ministry of Women and Child Development regarding the issues raised in the instant petition” the Court said.

It said, “We hope and trust that the respondents shall consider the same and take appropriate action on that.”

Sakshi Patil
“An Investment in Knowledge pays the best interest”. I Ms. Sakshi Patil currently pursuing Bachelors of Law (LLB) from Pune University ,and I believe that Knowledge is a commodity to share and it should be not remain the monopoly of selected few. Studying Law helps me understand how society is govern and how law acts as medicine to heal the society. Keeping positive and open minded approach in every aspect of life is the aim and I hope to learn with every opportunity and can help to those in need and create awareness among people about law and its importance. As quoted by Henry Ward Beecher, ”A Law is valuable not because it is a law ,but because there is right in it.”