Classification of children into sections on the basis of marks is likely to create feeling of inferiority and cannot be permitted: P&H HC

Justice Sudhir Mittal of the Panjab and Haryana High Court ruled that, the classification of students into sections on the basis of their marks is a violation of fundamental right of elementary education while observing that such a practice has the tendency of creating a feeling of inferiority among children securing less marks.

Prior Facts:

A parent of a child studying in a private school in Faridkot had challenged the institution’s decision to classify children, from class VI onwards, into sections on the basis of marks secured in the previous examination.

The Punjab State Commission for Protection of Child Rights had taken cognizance of the matter in June 2019 and directed the school, two months later, to discontinue the practice. The school failed to implement the order. When the Deputy Commissioner also asked it to implement the Commission’s order, the school responded that the order will be implemented after conclusion of the half-yearly session. In the meantime, the school and some parents of the children of the “top section” approached the Commission for review of the August order. The modification was allowed to continue with the classification till the end of academic session.

The Petitioner moved then to the High Court against the move of the school.

Key Features:

  • Punjab government supported Commission’s order and said that the modern trend of education is to make the same stress free and that is why the system of grading has been introduced and school’s action is contrary to that thought process, said the state government.
  • The September 2019 modification order, by which the school was allowed to continue the practice till the end of academic session, has been held to be illegal and without jurisdiction.
  • The single bench has said the law does not allow the Commission to review its own orders.
  • The August 2019 order was passed by Punjab Principal Secretary to Department of Social Security and Child Development, while exercising the powers of the Commission, which was not constituted then by the government.
  • Another parent had also raised a similar grievance before the school principal saying their child had become extremely upset as she could not make it to the top section and had even taken “the extreme step of gulping liquid hand wash in an attempt to end her life”.

Judgement:

Justice Mittal while striking the practise of the school in the ruling observed that:

  • Education is not “bookish knowledge alone” and it is an inclusive concept aimed at all round development of child.
  • A child is entitled to an atmosphere conducive to all round development. Necessarily, stimuli, which impair such development have to be kept out.
  • It is the duty of a school to ensure that children are not subjected to negative inputs, which have the effect of inducing a feeling of inferiority.
  • The act also violates the right of equal opportunity enshrined in the Constitution.
  • If an action induces a sense of inferiority in a child, it is being denied the right to development and growth at par with a child who does not suffer from such feeling of inferiority.

Observing that the Faridkot Deputy Commissioner should have taken remedial action immediately after receiving the August 2019 order from the Commission, the HC also said that the Commission could not have modified the order especially without notice to the petitioner.

Edited by J. Madonna Jephi

Approved & Published – Sakshi Raje

Reference:

  • Case of Dr. Neetu Kukar versus Union of India, CWP No. 36086 of 2019 clubbed with the case of Dashmesh Public School versus State of Punjab, CWP No. 32762 of 2019, decided by the High Court of Panjab and Haryana at Chandigarh on February 28, 2020.
Previous articleRTI Act would not apply when it comes to third party access to court documents or information on the judicial side
Next articleThe State Bar Councils
Vaibhav Goyal is a 3rd year BA.LLB (H) student of UILS, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. He also basically belongs to the “City Beautiful-Chandigarh”. He had interned and have work experience at various Central and State Government bodies of India including the National Human Rights Commission, New Delhi; the Central Information Commission, New Delhi; U.T. Legal Services Authority, Chandigarh, etc. His research projects includes the study on the Right to Emergency Services (PSHRC), Resettlement of Migrant People (NHRC), Implications of RTI in Financial Institutions (CIC), etc. His publications involve articles in different fields of law like administrative, jurisprudence, etc. on online journals including the Juscholars Blog, Burnished Law Journal, etc. His research paper on Prison Reform was published in the Panjab University Journal and his paper was selected in category of best abstract on the topic of Naxalism: A State of Lawlessness and Arbitrariness. He had scored well in various competitions of law consisting of Quiz, Essay Writing, Lecture, Declamation, etc. He had also participated in various conferences including the World Law Forum Conference on Strategic Lawsuits on Public Participation held in New Delhi on Oct 20, 2018 and the National Law Conclave 2020 held at Vigyan Bhawan, New Delhi on Jan 11, 2020.