Reservation Should Not Be Treated As The Only Method For Welfare Of Backward Classes: SC

Reservation Should Not Be Treated As The Only Method For Welfare Of Backward Classes: SC

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while pronouncing the verdict in the matter of Maratha quota observed that the reservation in public services is not the only way for the welfare of backward classes and the state should also consider other measures by which welfare of  SEBC cab be brought in.

The Hon’ble five-judge bench of the Hon’ble supreme court comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan, L Justice Nageswara Rao, Justice S Abdul Nazeer, Justice Hemant Gupta, and Justice S Ravindra stated that the 50% ceiling limit on the reservation that was framed by Mandal commission in the year 1979 was based on the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution and hence out rightly rejected to revisit the observation laid down in the Indira Sawhney case.

Additionally, an elaborated discussion on “wider possibilities” of affirmative action for backward classes has been put up in a separate judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court Judge.

Ananya Bharti
I am Ananya Bharti, second year student at Vivekananda Institute of professional studies. The constitutional law which set forth the basic law of land excites me the most. In addition to constitutional law , I also have an inclination to criminal law . According to me after constitutional law, criminal law is the most justifiable law for the society. Apart from this , I am also an avid reader and therefore at my recess fictious book becomes my bosom. So this is what I am.