Suo Motu case initiated against Ranjan Gogoi J. listed today after 1 year, 9 months By SC

AG KK Venugopal refuses to put former CJI Ranjan Gogoi under contempt of court for comments

After 1 year and 9 months, the suo-motu case registered by the Supreme Court in 2019 following sexual assault charges against then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi is scheduled for hearing today. 

After Justice Gogoi himself had sat on the Bench to hear the case, the matter titled “In Re: Matter of Great Public Importance Touching Upon the Independence of Judiciary” had generated quite a stir. 

The case was last heard by the Bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Rohinton Fali Nariman and Deepak Gupta on April 25, 2019, when the Court agreed to investigate whether a broader plot to frame the CJI and tarnish the judiciary was involved.

This development came after lawyer Utsav Bains sent some affidavits reportedly containing classified knowledge regarding certain plot to the court in a sealed cover. 

The Court had registered the affidavits and appointed Justice AK Patnaik, a former judge of the Supreme Court, to hold an investigation into the charges found in the affidavit. 

Although in October 2019, Justice Patnaik had submitted his report to the Court, the case was never called for hearing until today. 

The case was heard today by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian of the Bench of Justices. In April 2019, the charges against Justice Gogoi arose after four news channels reported reports of a lawsuit lodged against Gogoi J. by a Supreme Court staff member. 

When employed as a Junior Court Assistant in October 2018, she alleged that she was sexually assaulted by CJI Gogoi. She had outlined these charges in a representation submitted to the Supreme Court judges when demanding the initiation of an inquiry against CJI Gogoi. 

The Court reported the suo motu case on the same day that the charges were released and was listed in open court the same day. This happened on a day of non-working. Justice Gogoi sat on the bench himself and made a clear exception to the news stories while refusing the allegation.

Later, to investigate the broader question of the supposed plot posed by Utsav Bains, the case was referred to another three-judge bench led by Justice Arun Mishra. Meanwhile, a court-appointed committee created to investigate the charges gave Justice Gogoi a clean chit.

Purnima Ojha
‘Law is not law if it violates the principles of eternal Justice’ very beautifully penned down by Lydia Maria Child and I strongly believe, if the law is not made for the goods of people then at least it should not violate the essence of the principle of law that is “JUSTICE”. Law is made to keep each section of society on an equal platform and being a member of the law fraternity, I will try to contribute to the welfare of society. I am Purnima and I graduated from zoology (Hons) and am currently pursuing a law degree from Lloyd law college, Greater Noida. My desire is to bring a fair and unjust environment to our society through my hard work and persistent efforts.